Is there even a consensus for this there?

(In reply to comment #1)

Is there even a consensus for this there?

Yes, see the URL field. We discussed it during 2 weeks.

jeluf wrote:

Flagged revisions is not yet ready for production. This request will be processed after the code has been debugged and optimized.

OK, looks like:

$wgFlaggedRevsAutoReviewNew = true;
$wgSimpleFlaggedRevsUI = true;

$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote = false;

$wgFlaggedRevTags = array( 'accuracy'=>2 );
$wgFlagRestrictions = array(

'accuracy' => array('review' => 1),

);
$wgFlaggedRevsOverride = false;
$wgFlaggedRevsLowProfile = true;
$wgFlaggedRevValues = 3;
$wgFlaggedRevsPrecedence=false;
$wgFlaggedRevTabs = true;

$wgUseStableTemplates = true;
$wgUseStableImages = true;

// https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14166
$wgGroupPermissions['autoconfirmed']['movestable'] = true;

$wgFlaggedRevsNamespaces = array( NS_MAIN, NS_IMAGE, NS_TEMPLATE );

Note that flagging in image/template namespace is very useful for maintaining pages and keeping them up to date, as .de wp found it needed to do.

(In reply to comment #5)

Note that flagging in image/template namespace is very useful for maintaining
pages and keeping them up to date, as .de wp found it needed to do.

Then add them to the list, please.

yep, already there :)

I also assumed that new pages should be auto-sighted if possible as well.

Set.

dkovr wrote:

There is absolutely no consensus on this subgect in Russian Wikipedia community! Please disable FlaggedRevs on Russian Wikipedia!

dkovr wrote:

There is absolutely no consensus on this subject in Russian Wikipedia community! Please disable FlaggedRevs on Russian Wikipedia!

Please stop flooding here and misinforming the developers. It was approved by community during a poll, link to which is given in the URL field of this request. If you still can't see it, here it is once more: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия:Опросы/О_выверке_статей

If you feel this feature should be disabled, start a discussion locally and when consensus is reached, open a SEPARATE bug.

dkovr wrote:

In this poll
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия:Опросы/О_выверке_статей

There were 76 votes/opinions for this feature and 65 votes/opinions against this feature. There was no consensus at all. Community is divided in opinions about FlaggedRevs and did not approve it.

Is was closed as 'approved' by a bureaucrat, take it to him. Besides, do you understand what your 'reopen' means? It means that FlaggedRevs should be enabled, while you are requesting the opposite. Each request should have its own bug.

DB query indicates that some pages are using a custom "precedence/selection" setting for the stable version. This feature should be removed. What is it used for currently?

(In reply to comment #14)

DB query indicates that some pages are using a custom "precedence/selection"
setting for the stable version. This feature should be removed. What is it used
for currently?

Flagged protection. We switch pages to "approved-only" version when we do not want to protect them. Also, we use this to allow trustworthy non-admins edit main page.