| • bzimport | |
| Jun 3 2008, 7:25 PM |
| F4978: updated.patch | |
| Nov 21 2014, 10:14 PM |
Author: dasch
Description:
Patch from 03.06.2008
Here will be some changes I made to my MediaWiki (wecowi.org)
Maybe something could be useful for MediaWiki Development
Only take a quick look, feedback or questions are welcome
Version: 1.12.x
Severity: enhancement
attachment 03.06.2008.patch ignored as obsolete
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | None | T16336 Something Strange with SVG | |||
| Resolved | None | T16397 Patch for generateSitemap.php |
dasch wrote:
Patch from 03.06.2008
Sry wrong file
attachment 03.06.2008.patch ignored as obsolete
What does your patch fix? Some description would be nice :)
Could you please provide a patch w/o the whitespace changes, it makes a review harder. Thanks a lot.
dasch wrote:
Version without spaces
maybe the sources should always be cleaned of space, like my editor do
Attached:
dasch wrote:
Sure I'll explain
it is used in the Sitemap Index an in the sitemaps, so for example for my wiki I generate the sitemap with another domain for each week
On my Wiki it does not work with ulimit
(In reply to comment #5)
Raimond, can you please review the patch and advise?
Sorry, but someone else should review.
(In reply to comment #8)
the changes in main.css are for displaying skype: links like irc: links
Yes, obviously. But why would that be in a patch called "Patch for generateSitemap.php"? Can you please ensure to deliver a clean patch?
dasch wrote:
I don't know why this patch is named that way
Soembody changed it to that or the attaching of the diff file had changed the name
what does it mean a clean patch?
this was ment to be to but all changes for the Web Community Wiki together, to show what I've changed and then the developers could choose which of my changes are useful or not
(In reply to comment #10)
this was ment to be to but all changes for the Web Community Wiki together, to
show what I've changed and then the developers could choose which of my changes
are useful or not
Ah. That's a certain recipe for a patch to never be applied. You will have the highest succes rate submitting individual functionalities, fixes, or bugs in individual bugs.
Given your above explanation, I think this patch should be a WONTFIX.
dasch wrote:
okay, not my problem, just tried to show what I`ve changes, when there is nobody interested in it, then not
in my version there are these changes, so it's not for me
dasch wrote:
seams that I solved the problem that is given there, but nobody listens to my, not my problem
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9675 ***