Author: danny.leinad
Description:
After code update occurred following bugs:
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
danny.leinad wrote:
(In reply to comment #2)
- Newly created pages by editor don't be automatically marked as reviewed.
Fixed in r51925
claymore.ws wrote:
(In reply to comment #5)
- Stable versions of pages are shown by default even though the pages are not
stabilized.
What wiki is this?
(In reply to comment #0)
After code update occurred following bugs:
- edit made by editor and marked automatically as sighted still display with
red exclamation mark (also on RecentChanges)
- disappeared link "(review)" (a few months ago it was enabled, look bug16636)
(In reply to comment #7)
ruwiki
flaggedrevsstable preference default was wrong, fixed to "false" in r51931
Edits made by bots after sighted edit are not autosighted too (for example: http://uk.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%B8%82&diff=86435&oldid=86339 )
(In reply to comment #10)
Edits made by bots after sighted edit are not autosighted too (for example:
http://uk.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%B8%82&diff=86435&oldid=86339 )
See bug 19207. These really should be separate.
danny.leinad wrote:
(In reply to comment #10)
Edits made by bots after sighted edit are not autosighted too (for example:
http://uk.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%B8%82&diff=86435&oldid=86339 )
This issue has been reported in bug19207.
claymore.ws wrote:
danny.leinad wrote:
(In reply to comment #13)
- Some reviewed edits are shown as unreviewed in a watchlist. For example:
From my observation, only edits made between r51863 and r51943 have these damage. After syncing revision with correction 1)-4) it works correctly.
Changing Product: Wikimedia → Mediawiki extensions
Changing Component: WikiBugs → Flagged Revs
Reason: The wikibugs component is designed for the I.R.C. bot[1].
[1]. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Wikimedia
danny.leinad wrote:
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
- Some reviewed edits are shown as unreviewed in a watchlist. For example:
From my observation, only edits made between r51863 and r51943 have these
damage. After syncing revision with correction 1)-4) it works correctly.
Yes, the fix doesn't retroactively mark off some of the errant RC items.
(In reply to comment #16)
- (connected with issue 1.) Newly created pages by editor are marking
automatically as sighted, but:
- on RC and Watchlist still display with red exclamation mark (only with one
version in history, after next one edition red exclamation mark disappear)
- on [[Special:NewPages]] still display on yellow background (only with one
version in history...)
Can't reproduce locally.
danny.leinad wrote:
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #16)
- (connected with issue 1.) Newly created pages by editor are marking
automatically as sighted, but:
- on RC and Watchlist still display with red exclamation mark (only with one
version in history, after next one edition red exclamation mark disappear)
- on [[Special:NewPages]] still display on yellow background (only with one
version in history...)
Can't reproduce locally.
Sorry, but I don't understand...
Red exclamation mark means unreviewed pages or outdated reviewed pages. When editor create article, revision has mark "[automatically sighted]", so on Watchlist and RC this page shouldn't be show with red exclamation mark.
Am I mistaken?
claymore.ws wrote:
Alas, some autoeditors edits are still not marked as autoreviewed, see http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=revisions&titles=Харлем&rvprop=user|comment|flags|flagged|ids&rvstartid=16464709&rvlimit=1, for example.
danny.leinad wrote:
(In reply to comment #21)
Alas, some autoeditors edits are still not marked as autoreviewed, see
http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=revisions&titles=Харлем&rvprop=user|comment|flags|flagged|ids&rvstartid=16464709&rvlimit=1,
for example.
And also other type of "autoeditor" have the same problem... (ru.wiki has users with special right - bug15478, pl.wiki has autopromoted users with 'autoreview' permission - r47252).
Example: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Mathiasrex - after code update, user's edits aren't marking as autoreviewed.
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #16)
- (connected with issue 1.) Newly created pages by editor are marking
automatically as sighted, but:
- on RC and Watchlist still display with red exclamation mark (only with one
version in history, after next one edition red exclamation mark disappear)
- on [[Special:NewPages]] still display on yellow background (only with one
version in history...)
Can't reproduce locally.
Sorry, but I don't understand...
Red exclamation mark means unreviewed pages or outdated reviewed pages. When
editor create article, revision has mark "[automatically sighted]", so on
Watchlist and RC this page shouldn't be show with red exclamation mark.
Am I mistaken?
I'm refering to my test wiki.
danny.leinad wrote:
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #21)
Alas, some autoeditors edits are still not marked as autoreviewed, see
http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=revisions&titles=Харлем&rvprop=user|comment|flags|flagged|ids&rvstartid=16464709&rvlimit=1,
for example.And also other type of "autoeditor" have the same problem... (ru.wiki has users
with special right - bug15478, pl.wiki has autopromoted users with 'autoreview'
permission - r47252).Example: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Mathiasrex - after
code update, user's edits aren't marking as autoreviewed.
Hmmm... You overlooked above issue - #7.
danny.leinad wrote:
Sorry, but I find next issue...
As I said above, any other issue should go in their own bug. This is getting harder and harder to read.
danny.leinad wrote:
:(
You are inconsistent, first you mark bug19206 as duplicate of this, a than you didn't resolve this problem, because you are complaining about too many issues.
I've reopened bug19206 and report new bug19269.
(In reply to comment #29)
:(
You are inconsistent, first you mark bug19206 as duplicate of this, a than you
didn't resolve this problem, because you are complaining about too many issues.
I've reopened bug19206 and report new bug19269.
I didn't request that other issues be raised as separate bugs until comment #11; I should have said that sooner, but was only expecting 2-3 items would be posted here. REOPENing is fine.