Downgraded from blocker to trivial. The software is still in active development, there aren't that many blind users (and they're still able to use the software, even if blind and unable to click a certain feature), and "blocker" is reserved for bugs that block development work, which this doesn't.

My mistake for not knowing what "blocker" actually meant.

After reading explanations about severity, I would say the severity is "normal" or "major". This kind of issues are easy to solve in early stage of development, but might get more complicated later on. Plus, Andrew Garrett said that http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/12/liquidthreads-almost-ready-to-deploy/ liquidthreads is almost ready to deploy, and this issues proves that it is absolutely not the case.

I understand "reply" is the basic feature of a forum, and "history" and "edit" are important in a wiki. Blind users won't be able to use theses links, so they will only be able to read the content of the page. It will result in a loss of editors.

Accessibility is not only for blind users, although it is a common example. It also improves search engine optimization, reuse of the content, and many other things that are part of Wikipedia's goals. It is definitely not trivial. Yours, Rodan Bury

r62161