It's very annoying when you forget to mention a follow-up in a commit summary and are not able to get the revisions linked. There should be a manual way to do this; Trevor has some ideas about a UI.
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
Catrope | |
Oct 24 2010, 5:59 PM |
F7057: Screen_shot_2010-10-26_at_10.56.20_AM.png | |
Nov 21 2014, 11:14 PM |
F7056: Afbeelding_3.png | |
Nov 21 2014, 11:14 PM |
F7054: Screen_shot_2010-10-25_at_1.15.26_PM.png | |
Nov 21 2014, 11:13 PM |
It's very annoying when you forget to mention a follow-up in a commit summary and are not able to get the revisions linked. There should be a manual way to do this; Trevor has some ideas about a UI.
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
Created attachment 7755
Mock-up of associate follow-up revisions & sign-off features
This is a mockup of how we should probably layout the associate follow-up revisions and sign-off features.
Attached:
(In reply to comment #1)
Created attachment 7755 [details]
Mock-up of associate follow-up revisions & sign-off featuresThis is a mockup of how we should probably layout the associate follow-up
revisions and sign-off features.
Looks nice.
One suggestion though, a way of undo'ing such association would be handy.
Attached:
Small col on the right hand side with an X in it?
On another note, being able to remove erroneous follow up revisions from bad commit messages, that'd be cool (though, part of the same process)
The commit message can't be changed, but the followup table can be cleaned on the followed up bug :)
Looks good though! :D
Created attachment 7756
Concept for bug 25638
DOM manipulation on http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/74525
Attached:
Created attachment 7757
Improved version of code review mockup
This version includes the ability to strike sign-offs and remove associations.
Attached: