Would need community consensus and a security review first.

(In reply to comment #1)

Would need community consensus and a security review first.

I'm not sure why you think this would need community consensus. As for a security review, this is the current status of this extension on Wikimedia wikis:

'wmgUseLST' => array(

// controls loading of LabeledSectionTransclusion extension
'default' => false,
'wikisource' => true,
//---------------
'cswiktionary' => true, //22139
'dewikiversity' => true, //Per Bug 17773
'enwiktionary' => true,
'frwiki' => true,
'metawiki' => true,    
'sourceswiki' => true,
'testwiki' => false,

),

Source: http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/InitialiseSettings.php.txt

So I imagine it's already been checked for security issues. There might be other areas of concern (like load issues, e.g.), but I have no idea.

Daedalus969 wrote:

Last night I created a template that is based off of this extension.. note that it still needs to be modified in regards to it's use, so I haven't created the preload for the section creation yet. In regards to the #if I used, I've tested it on another wiki I'm an admin on and it works fine(testing to see if the section exists or not, basically).

For the template:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daedalus969/sandbox6

For the use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daedalus969/sandbox7

Daedalus969 wrote:

Last night I created a template that is based off of this extension.. note that it still needs to be modified in regards to it's use, so I haven't created the preload for the section creation yet. In regards to the #if I used, I've tested it on another wiki I'm an admin on and it works fine(testing to see if the section exists or not, basically).

For the template:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daedalus969/sandbox6

For the use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daedalus969/sandbox7

There's a short discussion about LST on wikitech-l: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2011-January/050991.html

Daedalus969 wrote:

Is there a reason you linked to that specific reply, which is difficult to tell if the poster is sarcastic about what they suggest? Reading into the thread further, it becomes obvious that they support #lst.

(In reply to comment #6)

Is there a reason you linked to that specific reply

Yes, it's the first and you click "Next message" to read the others.

Daedalus969 wrote:

(In reply to comment #7)

(In reply to comment #6)

Is there a reason you linked to that specific reply

Yes, it's the first and you click "Next message" to read the others.

Sorry for assuming bad faith.

So I guess the fix for this is: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/47353