Mobile view and printable can't work together, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coat_of_arms_of_Dewsbury&printable=yes&useformat=mobile
".noprint" not work.
Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
Mobile view and printable can't work together, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coat_of_arms_of_Dewsbury&printable=yes&useformat=mobile
".noprint" not work.
Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
Title | Reference | Author | Source Branch | Dest Branch | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add a small tool to convert RDF results in CSV format | repos/search-platform/IGUANA!3 | dcausse | transform-to-csv | main |
Fairly sure this has the same root cause as https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Common.css&oldid=480016042#Age_doesn.27t_show_up_on_mobile_wikipedia. I changed the bug summary to "MobileFrontend should not rely on noprint CSS class" accordingly.
Re-using the "noprint" class is clever, but ultimately unwise. Sometimes you want things to not be on mobile and sometimes you want things to not be on print. They're distinct categories, with some overlap. Luckily, CSS supports multiple classes.
There should be a "nomobile" class that should be used when people want to hide things from mobile. Currently it looks like people are inserting dummy classes to trick the mobile parser (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Birth_date_and_age&diff=479816119&oldid=436607844). This is bad.
Yeah, lets simplify our lives and focus on 29157 as its capturing this bugs issues.