Page MenuHomePhabricator

Empty Creative Commons license link (<a>) in footer
Closed, InvalidPublic

Description

Author: mohinder.khosla

Description:
Empty link in footer section of web pages

A empty link is present in the footer section of all pages next to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License link that is unrecognised with assistive technology tools such as JAWS and NVDA and hinders the flow of readability. The section of html that causes the problem is

<a rel="license" href="//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" style="display:none;"></a>

Browser: FF12

Machine Specifications:

Dell Laptop Mode: Studio 1555
Windows 7 Home Premium
Service Pack 1
System Type: 64 bit
Processor: Pentium (R) Dual-Core CPU T4300 2.1 GHz
RAM: 4 GB
Hard Drive: 500 GB


Version: 1.21.x
Severity: trivial
OS: Windows 7
Platform: PC

Attached:

Bug_21a-Empty_link_problem_with_MSAA.JPG (34×887 px, 16 KB)

Details

Reference
bz37516

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Low.Nov 22 2014, 12:29 AM
bzimport set Reference to bz37516.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

Still valid, but completely unrelated to AFTv5.

Isn't this a problem specific to the Vector skin?

No, this also happens when appending ?useskin=monobook to the URL.

This is a problem specific to English Wikipedia and whoever else copied the format of the footer at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright

(e.g. Spanish Wikipedia also has this problem, Catalan Wikipedia hasn't).

Reported at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Wikimedia-copyright#Bug_37516_-_Empty_Creative_Commons_license_link_.28.29_in_footer

Resolving as INVALID here, only because this is not a MediaWiki software bug. The issue itself must be discussed and decided by the Wikipedia editors with permissions to edit that footer.

Copying an answer from that thread:

eh it's display none... what the hell are those screenreaders doing looking at it... Can someone test if wrapping it in a span with display none would work ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 1:48 am, Today (UTC−7)

fwiw:

"It makes CC content engines able to detect the CC license. Note the "rel=license" part. See also http://creativecommons.org/choose/ and all our image copyright templates which use similar constructs to enable engines to pick up CC licensed content. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 11:30 am, Yesterday (UTC−7)"