Page MenuHomePhabricator

Please enable FlaggedRevs on eswikibooks
Closed, DeclinedPublic

Description

Author: jezarate

Description:
According local consensus: http://es.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikilibros:Caf%C3%A9#Flag_de_autoverificado I am requesting the implementation of FlaggedRevs on Spanish Wikibooks. Best Regards!!!!


Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
Whiteboard: aklapper-moreinfo
URL: http://es.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikilibros:Caf%C3%A9/Implantaci%C3%B3n_del_sistema_FlaggedRevs

Details

Reference
bz38806

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Low.Nov 22 2014, 1:09 AM
bzimport set Reference to bz38806.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

(In reply to comment #0)

According local consensus:
http://es.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikilibros:Caf%C3%A9#Flag_de_autoverificado I am
requesting the implementation of FlaggedRevs on Spanish Wikibooks. Best
Regards!!!!

Sorry but this change was done *far* to quick. The "consensus" is simply quite weak and we've not even discussed which configuration we would use. I request to temporary revert this until we can discuss all aspects of the implementation of that feature on es.wikibooks.

(In reply to comment #2)

(In reply to comment #0)

According local consensus:
http://es.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikilibros:Caf%C3%A9#Flag_de_autoverificado I am
requesting the implementation of FlaggedRevs on Spanish Wikibooks. Best
Regards!!!!

Sorry but this change was done *far* to quick. The "consensus" is simply quite
weak and we've not even discussed which configuration we would use. I request
to temporary revert this until we can discuss all aspects of the implementation
of that feature on es.wikibooks.

Requests should only be made when it's wanted. Disabled for now

(In reply to comment #3)

Requests should only be made when it's wanted. Disabled for now

That was I30c889c1eeb5a611dcd3446b29.

Esteban / Marco: What is the status of this? Was consensus found?

(In reply to comment #5)

Esteban / Marco: What is the status of this? Was consensus found?

The discussion stagnated over there. There's no consensus yet. Perhaps "resolved later" could be set here. I will report back to you if one day we get the consensus and config. desired. Thanks.

Ok, closing bug for now, but not "later", per [1]

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/65116

[url updated; reopened -> resolved:wontfix]