Page MenuHomePhabricator

Suppressredirect for patrollers on dawiki
Closed, InvalidPublic

Description

Hi there. We at da.wikipedia have discussed about obtaining rights to the "patrollers". We have concluded that patrollers must be assigned "suppressredirect". I've linked to here: http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Landsbybr%F8nden%23Flere_rettigheder_til_patruljanter%3F


Version: wmf-deployment
Severity: enhancement
URL: http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Landsbybr%C3%B8nden/Flere_rettigheder_til_patruljanter%3F

Details

Reference
bz43548

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 22 2014, 1:14 AM
bzimport set Reference to bz43548.

I believe you want "Site requests", not "Wikidata". Updated the component accordingly and added the "shell" keyword.

(In reply to comment #1)

I believe you want "Site requests", not "Wikidata". Updated the component
accordingly and added the "shell" keyword.

Done! :) And happy new year.

[ Taking this bug. Permanent link to consensus set as URL. ]

ole wrote:

(In reply to comment #3)

[ Taking this bug. Permanent link to consensus set as URL. ]

Please hold your horses. There is not consensus about this request.

I gave a quick peak at the discussion on dawiki thru google translate, for what it's worth, and it seems the initial closure was actually made by those who proposed it *headdesk* and that it has now been re-closed as no-consensus. Am I correct in my understanding of this (the re-closure as no-consensus)? If so, then we should mark this request as RESOLVED INVALID.

chris wrote:

@Snowolf: Yes, that is the correct.

The discussion is still going on. Let's wait a little more.

chris wrote:

(In reply to comment #8)

The discussion is still going on. Let's wait a little more.

Actually, they're just arguing about the debate and how person X spoke to person Y and so on, not discussing the actual topic.

Indeed the discussion is no longer on the outcome or the issue. Marking this as invalid for lack of consensus.