Author: dave
Description:
I sometimes find inaccuracies in articles but am often not sure about the proper
fact - I just know that the statement in question is not entirely correct. I do
not want to 'revise' the sentence/s with possibly another inaccuracy but rather
would like to put some sort of comment to the section, to let others see my
concern and to eventually lead to a correct and/or clarified section.
Let me explain my proposal further by outlining two oppositional modes of operation:
In MediaWiki software anyone can edit the whole article or leave his thoughts in
the 'discussion' page on every article, but there is no strong correlation to
the part objected.
The other side is, for example, the Documentation/Manual at php.net. Basically
it is moderated but readers can leave their ideas at the end of every page. Over
time, these comments may be included in the official documentation by the
moderators.
Something in between would be a comment-style system for every single section -
like the edit link, maybe titled 'discussion' like the global per-page
discussion link.
Inside this per-section discussion page it could work like well-known board
software pieces. There is the post of the thread starter as well as answers,
displayed, for example, as a tree structure. When a conclusion is reached and a
satisfying formulation was found, the whole thread can be dismissed or moved to
some sort of archive.
If a board-like implementation is not suitable right now, maybe a free-form
style of editing, like in the current global per-page discussion link is expedient.
However it looks like, there should be a number indicating the activity of this
comments-sections next to the discussion link.
I think this whole enhancement could attract the casual reader to look at the
comments and maybe induce him/her to add their own thoughts. All in all it may
promote participation.
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement