An initial population of untity_usage could be done based on the item_per_site. However, we have to decide whether we should mark the linked items as being used wrt the "sitelinks" aspect only (they all are), or wrt the "all" aspect (which only a few actually are). determining the *correct* aspect requires re-parsing the pages.
Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
Whiteboard: u=dev c=backend p=5
| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance script for populating wbc_entity_usage | mediawiki/extensions/Wikibase | master | +91 -1 |
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| · · · | ||||
| Resolved | Lydia_Pintscher | T49288 [Epic] Track Wikidata entity usage on client pages | ||
| Resolved | Lydia_Pintscher | T73050 Maintenance scripts for populating the entity_usage table from the item_per_site table. | ||
| Invalid | None | T75220 populate entity usage table during database schema update | ||
| · · · |
removed "based on items_per_site" from description, since we'll probably use page_props instead.
Change 176373 had a related patch set uploaded (by Daniel Kinzler):
Maintenance script for populating wbc_entity_usage
Change 176373 merged by jenkins-bot:
Maintenance script for populating wbc_entity_usage
Noted on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikidata_deployment. A separate ticket for that might be a good idea (as that will take a while and will need a bit of coordination).